PCGS submissions, Grading Opinions

[ausproofs]

I think 58 is a bit harsh, I looked at a few others to come to 61, that is usually in line with an ngc 62
maybe someone was having a bad day

I agree with that ... i thought MS61 was in order. .. but now I have to live with what I have ...

[robbiegal]

I think it looks far nicer than a 58

but there ya go

[trout]

That way Fun Ausproofs.

Here is another PCGS image for you guys to have some fun with.

[stevo1962]

MS66 would probably pull this one up

[ausproofs]

UNC - PVC damaged or cleaned

[robbiegal]

preddy
I am too scared to comment as I was way way out of that florin!! ha ha
but it looks close to GEM to me

[trout]

UNC - PVC damaged or cleaned

you don't get an image if the coin is "Boddybagged"

[markn]

I'll say MS66 or MS65.

[ausproofs]

UNC - PVC damaged or cleaned

you don't get an image if the coin is "Boddybagged"

Hahaha.. tried to be different. ..

Okay I will go MS 67...:yahoo:

Disclaimer. . I am very bad at grading  coins..

[echidna]

ms 64

[trout]

This is the coin, Well done Mark :good:
The secure images are pretty much crap to grade from.

http://www.pcgs.com/Cert/31865838.html

[robbiegal]

is aussie GEM close to MS66?

[oh my florin]

is aussie GEM close to MS66?

Personally I rate GEM as MS65 tho some particularly nice MS64s would also qualify for it too.

[stevo1962]

This is the coin, Well done Mark :good:
The secure images are pretty much crap to grade from.

http://www.pcgs.com/Cert/31865838.html

I managed to pick the grade as well after studying quite a few
1971 20 cent coins over the last year
Result is in at MS64  PCGS #32177018  Used trueview on this
but hasn't been uploaded yet and I'd say the mark on the flag
held it back a bit but still a great result

Finally have this one in my hot little hand and it may even
go MS65 or 66

[trout]

fantastic result mate.
:wavemulticolor: