PCGS submissions, Grading Opinions

ausproofs · April 26, 2015, 05:08:24 PM

Keep them coming guys... I will tell you the story and grade latest tomorrow. .. if not earlier.

trout · April 26, 2015, 05:11:54 PM

Quote from: 'ausproofs' pid='71359' dateline='1430033693'
Quote from: 'trout' pid='71358' dateline='1430033555'I'll give it a crack MS63

Hahaha... I thought you will have a go mate.. Lets get the others to have a try as well...I will post the correct grade tomorrow :idea:

HeHe
I was at the back of the line when they were handing Fear out, I missed out on my full quota :angel:

The band on the crown has me a bit concerned But It doesn't look like wear on my screen.
Far better than any example I have in my collection.
Nice coin Mate :yahoo:

ausproofs · April 26, 2015, 05:28:18 PM

Thanks Trout, it's a good looking coin... Rest of the story.... To be continued....

stevo1962 · April 26, 2015, 05:54:56 PM

I'll say it's MS64

ausproofs · April 26, 2015, 06:18:16 PM

Quote from: 'stevo1962' pid='71370' dateline='1430036696'I'll say it's MS64

Cheers Stevo, as a man with great capability grading coins from an image let's see how close you got to this little baby ...:yahoo:

echidna · April 26, 2015, 06:39:29 PM

its au58

robbiegal · April 26, 2015, 06:50:52 PM

nit a silvers guru but I would think it is in the choice uncirculated and I'd be suggesting either ms 64 + or ms 65
it has proof like fields to me and there is a bit of cabinet friction on the obverse but overall beautifully struck coin (to me)

ausproofs · April 26, 2015, 06:51:42 PM

Excellent work guys...

Quote from: 'echidna' pid='71375' dateline='1430039369'its au58

Why do you think it's an AU58 ? Very interested to know..

Thanks echidna !

wwwww · April 26, 2015, 06:55:00 PM

Quote from: 'echidna' pid='71375' dateline='1430039369'its au58

That was my first thought as well, too much wear on the obverse high points for an MS holder. That being said PCGS often allows coins with slight wear into MS holders when the surfaces are good enough, the reverse surfaces certainly are.

trout · April 26, 2015, 07:40:50 PM

I am NOT certain here But I am thinking you have done the PCGS restoration here with this coin (PVC Damage) , I'm sticking with my MS63 regardless :ok:

echidna · April 26, 2015, 07:43:00 PM

Quote from: 'ausproofs' pid='71377' dateline='1430040102'Excellent work guys...

Quote from: 'echidna' pid='71375' dateline='1430039369'its au58

Why do you think it's an AU58 ? Very interested to know..

Thanks echidna !

Reverse is UNC.
But too much chatter on the obverse for MS.
Eye appeal is strong therefore they will grade it 58.

ausproofs · April 26, 2015, 08:08:33 PM

Excellent call there Echidna ... It's an AU58... Crossed over form a NGC MS62...

Thanks for the feedback !

I am not happy with the result... However that's what it is ...

trout · April 26, 2015, 08:22:49 PM

Quote from: 'ausproofs' pid='71384' dateline='1430044713'Excellent call there Echidna ... It's an AU58... Crossed over form a NGC MS62...

Thanks for the feedback !

I am not happy with the result... However that's what it is ...

Bugger Trouty stuffs up again :dash1:
However I would buy that coin from you for "Bluesheet" prices at AU58 in a Heartbeat

Great looking Coin Mate.

ausproofs · April 26, 2015, 08:33:34 PM

Quote from: 'trout' pid='71385' dateline='1430045569'
Quote from: 'ausproofs' pid='71384' dateline='1430044713'Excellent call there Echidna ... It's an AU58... Crossed over form a NGC MS62...

Thanks for the feedback !

I am not happy with the result... However that's what it is ...

Bugger Trouty stuffs up again :dash1:
However I would buy that coin from you for "Bluesheet" prices at AU58 in a Heartbeat
Great looking Coin Mate.

Hahaha... Moral of the story is unless you are 110% sure you have to be carful buying coins off an image on the net :wavemulticolor:

serial · April 26, 2015, 09:06:07 PM

I think 58 is a bit harsh, I looked at a few others to come to 61, that is usually in line with an ngc 62
maybe someone was having a bad day