What Do YOU Collect?

Started by naomi_j86, September 24, 2012, 07:52:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

naomi_j86

So what is it that makes you contemplate selling your first-born for?
Decimal?
Wavy's?
Pre-Decimal?
PNCs?

For me, it's $1 coins. Gosh they make me happy! I love being at work sifting through the $1 coins and finding one that's 'not supposed to be there' (a NCLT $1).

That has also helped me find my beloved mules!
~Naomi.

accumulator

Hi Naomi, Error Coins is a favourite of mine,i love getting a really spectacular error to add to my collection,having said that though i also love a really nice unblemished coin to upgrade my existing collection.
I have a multitude of 1964 dated coins as that is my birth year,probably not a great investment but thats not why i collect them.:ok:

Nevol

I also love error coins, not so much that I'd give up either of my kids for them, but  they are my main focus lately. :icon_e_biggrin:
A Platypus is a duck designed by a committee ( anon)

Mister T

Mainly Australian coins, but also other Commonwealth stuff.
Not really into error coins though.

Graham

Mainly $1s. But I also have a large collection of rolls, world coins and errors

autocoupler

Aussie coins mostly, with a soft spot for varieties as well as the odd error, but not into damage. Having said this, one of my favorites is a 1971 British 2 new pence minted on a cupro nickel planchet?
As we age we lose three things, one is our memory and arrrrr I\'ve forgotten the other two!

errorsarebest

Aussie and some world error coins. Wrong planchets, mules, large die breaks, brockages, indents, DDRs and DDOs.

markn

Whatever captures my eye.  I find myself drawn in by eye appeal and scarcity.  World coins and Aussie stuff as long as it's pretty, mostly raw, occasionally slabbed.  I still pick up some errors but they have to very unusual or exceptionally high grade to get me interested these days.
Founder: Australian Coin Forum
The Australian Coin Collecting Blog

purplepennyhunter

I collect 1966 stuff, anything and everything to do with the changeover from medallions to retail promotional conversion tables and material to glassware and even tea towels. This is what i enjoy the most.

Anything high grade with colour catches my eye pre-decimal and decimal. I've begun a GB farthing collection and a NZ threepence collection but generally choose high quality over a coin just because I don't have one for that year. Hence i have a lot of 1964 pennies.

I am a sucker for a top quality error and indents are my favourite. I also have a complete dollar collection including all mintmarks but i only keep that up to date because i have to now, there are just too many releases and the quality is not there.

I do not collect anything from the perth mint unless it's under bullion!!
Co-Founder Australian Coin Forum

Sapyx

I collect coins: Australian and foreign, ancient medieval and modern. Banknotes Australian and World too, though not as heavily as coins. I also have a small collection of tokens, medals and other "fringe" numismatic objects.
Waste no more time arguing what a good man should be. Be one.
    Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius, \"Meditations\"

gnome

I started collecting australian predecimal coins, then I ventured into aussie decimals, errors and varieties, australian notes, both predecimal and decimal, american, new guinea, new zealand, english,  Queen Victoria, counterfeit coins, some miscellaneous world coins, and I am taking a look casino chips and tokens.
I'm pretty sure I have missed some as well.
Used to be RAM items, such as wedding sets and pnc's, but not so much nowadays.  Occassionally I still venture into the 50c and $1.
I don't have any full sets of anything finished, which makes it still interesting.

jrg_from_oz

I have an exceptionally narrow focus, and collect GB sixpences dated 1867 or 1868. I bought my first in 1975, and still haven't completed the set, because I collect by combination of rev die number (27 is the highest recorded) and obverse die (there are two).

The attraction is that, while it is certain that all combinations of 27 die numbers and 2 obv dies for each of the 2 years were not minted, there are no official records as to what was actually produced. I have 48 of the possible combinations, and from contact over the years with other (equally mad!) collectors around the world I know of 5 other combinations where just a single example is known. Presumably others were minted, but I just haven't found them yet!

Why do I collect such a limited field? Because the period covers the change in the obverse die, from the die used up until 1866, to the die used from 1869 onwards, but the major catalogues (originally Seaby, now Spink) don't acknowledge the fact that 1867 and 1868 exist with both obverse dies.

John

Nevol

That is a very specialized field. I have just 1 x 1868, so badly worn the date is barely legible and it's possible there could be a 9 above the date, but even with my Microscope, I'm not sure.  

:welcome: to TACF. :grin:
A Platypus is a duck designed by a committee ( anon)

jrg_from_oz

1868 (9) exists with both obverses, and I have both.

John

Mister T

Quote from: 'jrg_from_oz' pid='1023' dateline='1348925661'I have an exceptionally narrow focus, and collect GB sixpences dated 1867 or 1868. I bought my first in 1975, and still haven't completed the set, because I collect by combination of rev die number (27 is the highest recorded) and obverse die (there are two).

The attraction is that, while it is certain that all combinations of 27 die numbers and 2 obv dies for each of the 2 years were not minted, there are no official records as to what was actually produced. I have 48 of the possible combinations, and from contact over the years with other (equally mad!) collectors around the world I know of 5 other combinations where just a single example is known. Presumably others were minted, but I just haven't found them yet!

Why do I collect such a limited field? Because the period covers the change in the obverse die, from the die used up until 1866, to the die used from 1869 onwards, but the major catalogues (originally Seaby, now Spink) don't acknowledge the fact that 1867 and 1868 exist with both obverse dies.

That's pretty interesting. Got any pictures?
Does English Silver Coinage cover these varieties?