Australian Coin New Buy Online for the year 2014, 2015, 2016

[pranab sarkar]

Dear All,

I stay in INDIA(West Bengal), and I want to know that how can I get/purchase online new AUSTRALIAN original coins for the year 2014, 2015, 2016, I am telling about circulated coins not about Gold and Silver valuable coins.

I want to purchase circulated original coins of Australia for the year 2014, 2015, 2016, please guide me reading it




Thanks and Regards,
Pranab Sarkar

[keldaw]

Dear All,

I stay in INDIA(West Bengal), and I want to know that how can I get/purchase online new AUSTRALIAN original coins for the year 2014, 2015, 2016, I am telling about circulated coins not about Gold and Silver valuable coins.

I want to purchase circulated original coins of Australia for the year 2014, 2015, 2016, please guide me reading it

pranab , I have passed your message on to a very good friend of mine ,he also is from india 35 years ago .   ,, kel ,,[/color]


Thanks and Regards,
Pranab Sarkar

[Fulvio]

Messed up that formatting slightly, eh, Kel? :angel:

---

I Kel's mate doesn't work out, I have an Indian friend who travels back and forth to Mumbai regularly.

[Goldseeker]

Dear All,

I stay in INDIA(West Bengal), and I want to know that how can I get/purchase online new AUSTRALIAN original coins for the year 2014, 2015, 2016, I am telling about circulated coins not about Gold and Silver valuable coins.

I want to purchase circulated original coins of Australia for the year 2014, 2015, 2016, please guide me reading it



Thanks and Regards,
Pranab Sarkar

I believe that you can set up an account directly with the RAM, (Royal Australian Mint), and you can order directly with them.

[Fulvio]

That won't help him with circulating coins, or prior years.

[LooseChange]

ebay probably easiest

[kchan1111]

Probably easiest to buy from a dealer? Newcastle coins has both 2014 and 2015 still

http://www.newcastlecoins.com.au/c212.html

MR Roberts even has the 2015 set on discount

http://www.wynyardcoins.com.au/shop/australian-decimal-coins/royal-australian-mint/2015/mint-set-2015-6-mint-50th-anniversary/

[trout]

The trouble with the recent Mint sets from 2012-2015 is that they are not a truly representative set of circulation coins for the year because of the various "Special" coins in them.
To get the complete set for the year you needed to buy the baby set as well or instead.
I think Mr Sarkar would be better off looking through eBay ex roll listings for these as this would most likely be the most cost efficient way of going about sourcing these coins :ok:

As he only requires circulated coins then maybe we could offer to help out when the required number of posts have been attained.
I am pretty sure that there are members here that would be more than happy to help and even trading Aussie coins for Indian coins wouldn't be such a bad idea

[Fulvio]

We're talking what, $3.85 per year? A couple of bucks more if we include circulating commemoratives? Twenty bucks including postage should cover it nicely. And I'm sure we wouldn't have any trouble finding some reasonable quality either. Not UNC, but not rubbish either.

[keldaw]

Messed up that formatting slightly, eh, Kel? :angel:

sorry fulvio , I don't understand what I said wrong ,
 I know every time I open my mouth , I say something wrong ,
 but I wish people would explain what I am saying wrong .
this is the main reason I don't talk much on the forum much anymore .please don't be offended by this , as i know it is not your fault , it is mine for saying the wrong things always .

---

I Kel's mate doesn't work out, I have an Indian friend who travels back and forth to Mumbai regularly.

[Fulvio]

Nothing wrong with what you said.

You just need to get the hang of how tags work, that's all. And the more you post, the more practice you'll get. Chin up!

The critical things are that a) Tags come in pairs, and are enclosed in square [] brackets, and b) The first one goes where you want an effect to start, and the second one, with the /, goes where you want it to end. Oh, and they should nest properly. So if you use tags 1,2,3 then at the other end they should be /3,/2,/1

[ b] [ i]like this bold, italic example[ /i][ /b]
like this bold, italic example

Easy once you get the hang of it. The forum does most of the work for you, though you can do it manually, like I'm doing now in this quick reply. The problems start when you edit things and get the tags messed up. Like you did just then, putting your reply in the middle of my [ quote] block. The right way to do it was to finish what I said with a [ /quote], then start the bit after what you typed with a new [ quote]. That would have put your comment in between two quotes, one with my name and the second without (unless you also typed the attribution in the second one, see?).

You can do this. Really.

[robbiegal]

nit picking on other posters though is quite off putting and can make people, like how Kel has described it,  or like another post that I just saw where the poster was chatted about 'spamming' the thread when he simply tried to correct something that other/others had pointed out "Try trimming attributions. Spamming a wall of text serves no purpose other than to increase the number of pages people need to wade through." FFS seriously???

people can be left feeling intimidated to post

and that isn't what the forum is meant to be about and I also doubt that those who hassle really mean to so constantly intimidate but that becomes the affect

or perhaps once again i am also wrong

[trout]

or perhaps once again i am also wrong

I don't think you got it wrong at all RG :ok:
I also think that Fulvio wasn't being intentionally confrontational or dismissive , I think he was just trying to help.

[Fulvio]

I think he was just trying to help.

Thanks mate.

Like just about everything in modern life, social media, which this is, is an acquired skill. And like every skill, from hammering a nail to doing brain surgery, some people pick it up quicker than others. There's no shame in that. Like most of us, there are plenty of things I'm totally hopeless at. And for those things, I wish I had people to ELI5 them (Explain Like I'm 5). Usually though, no such help is available, and I'm left to muddle along on my own, trying to glean insights through Google.

So, when something comes along that IS in an area I know a little bit about, whether its Errors, Dogecoin, Computers, Plastics, or anything else, I try to help.

RG, I'm really sorry you see that as intimidating.

As for attributions, I was around at the dawn of the Internet. I saw threads on Usenet where people quoted 20 pages of text and then added a single word as their reply. That was stupid then, and its stupid now. Social Media is NOT Email, nor is it Snail Mail. Attributions, If present at all, should be just long enough to make clear what is being replied to, and no longer. Because the original text is right there in front of the reader's nose, and repeating it over and over is like a face-to-face conversation where the other person repeats every word you say back to you. Annoying and a waste of time and effort for all parties.

If you went through every thread here and removed all the attributions, especially the pictures, you could halve the amount of material with zero loss of content. So you're paying (in whatever currency, be it time, money, bandwidth, storage Mark has to pay for or whatever) double for no benefit whatsoever.

So yes, "FFS seriously!!!!"

[trout]

All is good Mate.
I have been told that I have all the social skills of a rhinoceros myself.
Ah well , at least I am a happy Rhino ( most Times):yahoo::laugh2: