Noodling finds

Started by Nevol, December 23, 2012, 05:35:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Fulvio

Quote from: 'Ozcoins' pid='36101' dateline='1386070352'It does not look very 'proof like' any more. The frosted detail is still there, but the background looks pretty normal now - not really shiny.

Any chance of piccies? I'd like to compare to some I have which are definitely not business strikes.
http://fulvio55.altervista.org/ - Decimal Mintages and Polymer Notes PDFs
Doge: DG8r9JJnWCHVvd1iG4BJeJMj5g1reYTnSc - BTC: 1FFnNxMDNCnQEjHrh9EhnHZoDMjkbf1seW

Ozcoins

I will try to put up some pics, but not tonight.

trout

Nothing special but I am keeping them anyway 




Aim well to enjoy life. You only get One shot at it.
Illegitimi non carborundum

Fulvio

Quote from: 'trout' pid='36167' dateline='1386139500'Nothing special but I am keeping them anyway

Yup. Those are all automatic keepers I reckon.
http://fulvio55.altervista.org/ - Decimal Mintages and Polymer Notes PDFs
Doge: DG8r9JJnWCHVvd1iG4BJeJMj5g1reYTnSc - BTC: 1FFnNxMDNCnQEjHrh9EhnHZoDMjkbf1seW

runway

It's unreal the 1970 Cook 50c is still a commonly found coin in circulation
Buy what gives you enjoyment

Ozcoins

I tried doing a pic with the phone this morning, but it does not resize....  Does not even tell you the size of the photos taken either.

Anyway, here are a couple of pics of the 1991 proof.

The quality of the light makes a big difference.  I spotted it under fluorescent light, and it took seeing the year to confirm it for me.
In sunlight it is much more clearly a proof.

Fulvio

Quote from: 'Ozcoins' pid='36201' dateline='1386157760'Anyway, here are a couple of pics of the 1991 proof.

Yup, same as the dozen or so I've found. I wasn't convinced they were proofs actually... I was thinking specimens maybe. Dunno why but they're just not like I'd imagine a proof would wear. *shrug*
http://fulvio55.altervista.org/ - Decimal Mintages and Polymer Notes PDFs
Doge: DG8r9JJnWCHVvd1iG4BJeJMj5g1reYTnSc - BTC: 1FFnNxMDNCnQEjHrh9EhnHZoDMjkbf1seW

robbiegal

hi guys
- do I have this one right
it  is a normal 50c (ie not incused?)
I made up a jpeg of both variety types and matched it up against normal

Nevol

Yep, that's your regular old 200 50c, not an incuse. :angel:
A Platypus is a duck designed by a committee ( anon)

trout

Quote from: 'Nevol' pid='36293' dateline='1386241358'Yep, that's your regular old 200 50c, not an incuse. :angel:

Crickey  I am sure I sent you a real one to compare the others with Mate :dash1:
Aim well to enjoy life. You only get One shot at it.
Illegitimi non carborundum

Fulvio

Quote from: 'robbiegal' pid='36292' dateline='1386241226'it  is a normal 50c (ie not incused?)

Easiest way to tell is look at the large star. Notice it has a rough bottom? The incused one is smooth, as you can see in this rather poor ebay piccy:

http://fulvio55.altervista.org/ - Decimal Mintages and Polymer Notes PDFs
Doge: DG8r9JJnWCHVvd1iG4BJeJMj5g1reYTnSc - BTC: 1FFnNxMDNCnQEjHrh9EhnHZoDMjkbf1seW

JeffH

Watch it Fulvio! I will have to put on a Larena tanty about copyright.
How about this image?
Thinking is dangerous, it makes you think. That\'s why many people avoid it.

Pedro

Very handy comparison pics Jeff.

Pedro

purplepennyhunter

Co-Founder Australian Coin Forum

Ozcoins

I found a 2011 Rams head 'C' mint mark $1 last night.
Designs that are clearly different to 'normal' circulating coins stand out, but I often wonder how many of the other good condition (or even well worn) coins you can find have been broken out of packaging and spent.