Silver Saturday

Started by Triggersmob, January 25, 2014, 01:20:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Goose

Steve, you're right about the '67 dime that were minted in .500 and .800 silver. Also, about 30% of the 1968 were .500 silver withe the remainder minted in 100% nickel.

And you're also right Trout in that the '67 quarter was minted in .500 and .800 silver. Then about 45% of the 1968 quarters were also minted in .500 silver.....the rest 100% nickel.
As for telling the difference between .500 and .800 silver? I can't and really don't worry about it. It is quite easy to tell the difference between any .500 & .800 silver and a nickel alloy coin by their appearance.

Triggersmob

I'm not a variety collector, so I'm happy to just have one of each denomination, regardless of it's purity.
Steve

OFEC count = 258

trout

As these coins are quite small the difference in the intrinsic value of the different metal compositions is not that inportant.
I have noticed however that the higher the silver content a coin has the nicer the toning becomes as a rule :ok:
Aim well to enjoy life. You only get One shot at it.
Illegitimi non carborundum

Triggersmob

Quote from: 'trout' pid='98918' dateline='1474976349'As these coins are quite small the difference in the intrinsic value of the different metal compositions is not that inportant.
I have noticed however that the higher the silver content a coin has the nicer the toning becomes as a rule :ok:

I'm not concerned about the value, as you said there in not much difference. I would just like to be able to catalogue it correctly as a KM#68 or KM#68a.
Steve

OFEC count = 258

trout

Quote from: 'Triggersmob' pid='98931' dateline='1475013640'
Quote from: 'trout' pid='98918' dateline='1474976349'As these coins are quite small the difference in the intrinsic value of the different metal compositions is not that inportant.
I have noticed however that the higher the silver content a coin has the nicer the toning becomes as a rule :ok:

I'm not concerned about the value, as you said there in not much difference. I would just like to be able to catalogue it correctly as a KM#68 or KM#68a.

If you look at the 2 metals side by side you can see the difference.
Put 2  silver florins of the same grade But one being Stirling Silver and the other being 50% silver and you will see a difference, it is subtle but you will notice it :ok:
Aim well to enjoy life. You only get One shot at it.
Illegitimi non carborundum

Triggersmob

Might have to give that a try, but the coin is heavily toned, so that makes it difficult.
Like you said though, the higher silver content tone better, so that might be an indication.
Steve

OFEC count = 258

Goldseeker

If you are trying to find out which is silver or nickel, why not do a drop test.

Silver coins have a higher ring tone when dropped that other coins.

It might not be 100% but at least it will give you an indication.
Message rec\'d from Jens Coins 18 Jul 23: 
Bruce Mansfield passed away today 18 Jul 2023 – Acute Myeloid Leukemia


Triggersmob

Quote from: 'Goldseeker' pid='99019' dateline='1475056447'If you are trying to find out which is silver or nickel, why not do a drop test.

No, I'm trying to distinguish between 0.500 and 0.800 silver.
Steve

OFEC count = 258

r9453

I bought this from a bloke named David Guy:

Two Bob coin collector.

trout

Aim well to enjoy life. You only get One shot at it.
Illegitimi non carborundum

trout

As we had a bit of Canadian flavour last week, Here are a couple of the other 1967 Canadian Silver coins :)



Aim well to enjoy life. You only get One shot at it.
Illegitimi non carborundum

Triggersmob

Beautiful coins R9453 and Trout.
Steve

OFEC count = 258

r9453

I bought this coin from a Sydney dealer some time ago not noticing the die cracks until the other day when I photographed it:

Two Bob coin collector.

Unicorn

Lovely coin, top pics!! :good:

Robster

\"Everything in moderation, including moderation\".