CWOS Coins worthy of slabbing

[ausjack]

Oh excellent thank you so very much RG, your a sweetheart :give_heart:

[autocoupler]

I collected this some time ago because of the left tilted 4. Thinking lately of maybe sending it to a TPG, and now wondering if I'm wasting my time because of the reverse planchet flaw? Didn't consider it to be a negative at the time :dash1: It was a split grade of gEF/aUNC. Opinions appreciated

[echidna]

I'd say its borderline as to whether they will grade it.
If they do they will deduct points for the flaw.
My guess is 58 - 2 points = 53

[Nevol]

I'm not so sure it's a Pl.Flaw.  Looks like a cud on the N to me.

[stevo1962]

I reckon it will slip through

Just aquired these 2 and was wondering if poeple considered these worth slabbing




coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10137/mule_a.jpg[/img]

[JeffH]

They look in reasonable nick and the first one is reasonably well centred. So at a potential selling price in the range of $500 to $800, depending on actual grade achieved, the slabbing cost is likely worth it.

I find it hard to estimate grades of $1 coins from a photo -have you considered what they may grade?

[stevo1962]

They look in reasonable nick and the first one is reasonably well centred. So at a potential selling price in the range of $500 to $800, depending on actual grade achieved, the slabbing cost is likely worth it.

I find it hard to estimate grades of $1 coins from a photo -have you considered what they may grade?

I'd say they would grade between VF30 to XF45 but mid range dollars can go either
way I'd say

[autocoupler]

I'd say its borderline as to whether they will grade it.
If they do they will deduct points for the flaw.
My guess is 58 - 2 points = 53

Thanks echidna, I might risk it

I'm not so sure it's a Pl.Flaw.  Looks like a cud on the N to me.

It is a flaw Nevol, the flap is still in place

I reckon it will slip through

Thanks stevo, and that first mule of yours looks better than gVF to me

[autocoupler]

Appreciate any thoughts on these. 1931 Indian dropped 1, 1942I with missing mm. Would the toning on the 31, and the heavier toning on the 42 prevent them from being CWOS? TIA

[echidna]

The 42 looks gradable to me.
2 points for the streaky tone though.
Dunno about the 31.
I'd just send both in if they were mine.

I like the 31 - very nice coin despite the uneven tone/colour.

[gnome]

Envious of the 31, mate. Nice looking coin.

[autocoupler]

Thanks for the feedback Guys

[gnome]

The other list is equally impressive.

[autocoupler]

Thanks G. Most are from ebay, but in a weak moment I did pay for a couple of others :blink:

[gnome]

I've got quantity instead of the quality, mainly lower grade ones. Still missing the 31 and one or two of the 20's. Pain in the butt to try and keep sorted at times.