Your Opinion please

Started by MattGold, June 12, 2013, 10:56:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Fulvio

Quote from: 'MattGold' pid='18026' dateline='1371118787'I'm not sure if this would be right or not but under the magnifier it looks like the something could have been on the die when the coin was struck and that pushed the metal towards the lettering!!

Eh? Is it raised or lowered? Because it looks raised in the pic, and a strikethrough would result in a cavity, like you see on lots of 1984/85 dollars and such. If this is extra metal, or deformed metal, its not the result of a strikethrough.

The coin shows severe doubling. But I can't see that being related. The bounce is upwards, and shows no sign of twisting. Its uniform across the whole coin too, which I think is inconsistent.

I presume you would have noticed anything unusual about the rim if it were related to the collar?

Perhaps there was a problem with the planchet before it was struck? That might explain it, maybe...
http://fulvio55.altervista.org/ - Decimal Mintages and Polymer Notes PDFs
Doge: DG8r9JJnWCHVvd1iG4BJeJMj5g1reYTnSc - BTC: 1FFnNxMDNCnQEjHrh9EhnHZoDMjkbf1seW

Nevol

QuoteI cannot remember for the life of me but someone on here showed me photoscape for all my editing needs, I just have to remember to resize the image in future..
That was Fordprefect.  

I started using Photoscape a few years ago, it's Brilliant!
A Platypus is a duck designed by a committee ( anon)

MattGold

Quote from: 'Fulvio' pid='18080' dateline='1371160866'
Quote from: 'MattGold' pid='18026' dateline='1371118787'I'm not sure if this would be right or not but under the magnifier it looks like the something could have been on the die when the coin was struck and that pushed the metal towards the lettering!!

Eh? Is it raised or lowered? Because it looks raised in the pic, and a strikethrough would result in a cavity, like you see on lots of 1984/85 dollars and such. If this is extra metal, or deformed metal, its not the result of a strikethrough.

The coin shows severe doubling. But I can't see that being related. The bounce is upwards, and shows no sign of twisting. Its uniform across the whole coin too, which I think is inconsistent.

I presume you would have noticed anything unusual about the rim if it were related to the collar?

Perhaps there was a problem with the planchet before it was struck? That might explain it, maybe...

It is raised Fulvio

Quote from: 'Nevol' pid='18090' dateline='1371164527'
QuoteI cannot remember for the life of me but someone on here showed me photoscape for all my editing needs, I just have to remember to resize the image in future..
That was Fordprefect.  

I started using Photoscape a few years ago, it's Brilliant!

Thanks for that, yes it is brilliant, so quick n easy but I just need to remember to resize my images when I upload them, it always seems to slip my mind

Nevol

I find it easier to resize while I'm Cropping or adding arrows, get it all done at once, saves time in the long run.  

I rarely re-size these days as I let either Tinypic or Photoshop do it for me automatically when I'm getting images ready to post. In fact, most re-sizing I do is to increase size.
A Platypus is a duck designed by a committee ( anon)

MattGold

Thought I would use this same topic as I would like your opinions please??
Fair Condition 1966 20 cent with what looks to be a crack and bent curl??
Sorry never marked the area but you should be able to see what I see




Thanks...

Nevol

Looks like a lam flaw. :angel:
A Platypus is a duck designed by a committee ( anon)

MattGold

Thanks Nevol, what would cause the curl to bend like that?

Nevol

The Green/Yellow arrows indicate approx where I think the Lam starts and ends.
Green/Red arrow shows the Lam lifting
Red/Blue arrow is, I think, the 'bent curl' you refer to.  IMO that is most likely PMD from the coin taking a hit smack on the edge of the wave.  

A Platypus is a duck designed by a committee ( anon)

MattGold

Thanks you Nevol for that great description, also thanks for marking the areas for me...

Fulvio

Quote from: 'Nevol' pid='18320' dateline='1371279306'The Green/Yellow arrows indicate approx where I think the Lam starts and ends.
Green/Red arrow shows the Lam lifting
Red/Blue arrow is, I think, the 'bent curl' you refer to.  IMO that is most likely PMD from the coin taking a hit smack on the edge of the wave.  

I'd concur, except I see multiple faults. At least three parallel lines, and pieces missing from two of them looks like. And yeah, that vertical rip is PMD, but who cares? Still a nice coin.
http://fulvio55.altervista.org/ - Decimal Mintages and Polymer Notes PDFs
Doge: DG8r9JJnWCHVvd1iG4BJeJMj5g1reYTnSc - BTC: 1FFnNxMDNCnQEjHrh9EhnHZoDMjkbf1seW

MattGold

Thanks Fulvio, I think I can see the lines you mentioned haha..

On another note, I am posting this piccie on behalf of a facebook forum member friend, can anyone tell me if this is PMD or??? The coin isn't hers so she doesn't have it with her to take other photos to show diff angles but she is waiting for some from the person with the actual coin.. (sorry just confused myself there hehe)

Hopefully this pic is enough to tell..

Australian coin

I am going to guess its a $2 coin, and PMD

MattGold

Quote from: 'Australian coin' pid='18618' dateline='1371626993'I am going to guess its a $2 coin, and PMD

Woops yep it's a $2 and thanks, will let her know.

Fulvio

Yeah, what AC said.. anytime you see evidence of grinding, it has to be PMD, because nothing in the manufacturing process will do that. There are other issues as well, but that's the biggie. :)
http://fulvio55.altervista.org/ - Decimal Mintages and Polymer Notes PDFs
Doge: DG8r9JJnWCHVvd1iG4BJeJMj5g1reYTnSc - BTC: 1FFnNxMDNCnQEjHrh9EhnHZoDMjkbf1seW

MattGold

What about this one guys n gals??
Thanks in advance



Matt