1966 20 cents

trout · January 17, 2013, 09:58:58 AM

Its all been pre decimal so far.
How about this one.
[attachment=958][attachment=957]

stevo1962 · January 17, 2013, 10:39:29 AM

A bit of scuffing on both sides MS62?

trout · January 17, 2013, 10:44:08 AM

Quote from: 'stevo1962' pid='6548' dateline='1358381369'A bit of scuffing on both sides MS62?

I think i got this one in one of them BP wallets, Not that flash hay :dash1:

stevo1962 · January 17, 2013, 10:50:59 AM

The fields are clean but must have been out of the wallet at some stage or can they get
that way in the wallet?

enworb · January 17, 2013, 11:17:45 AM

Its still UNC at least IMO. Im betting the scuffing isnt quite as bad as the scans suggest.

Graham · January 17, 2013, 11:25:07 AM

I must be too tough on my coins. I'll have to reconsider how I grade coins. I note the bag marks (scratches) on the 2 and the scuffing on the Queen's cheek. I consistently threw these back when searching rolls containing much more current dates. I would grade it at the lower end of UNC. Whats that? MS 62?

I'd have it my collection, but I would be looking to upgrade.

trout · January 17, 2013, 11:37:42 AM

Quote from: 'Graham' pid='6558' dateline='1358384107'I must be too tough on my coins. I'll have to reconsider how I grade coins. I note the bag marks (scratches) on the 2 and the scuffing on the Queen's cheek. I consistently threw these back when searching rolls containing much more current dates. I would grade it at the lower end of UNC. Whats that? MS 62?

I'd have it my collection, but I would be looking to upgrade.

I agree, I'm working on that :good:

1966 20 cents

trout

stevo1962

trout

stevo1962

enworb

Graham

trout