Australian-Coins Forum

Australian Coins, Banknotes and Exonumia => Australian Pre-Decimal Coins => Topic started by: Basil on June 20, 2018, 01:20:04 PM

Title: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: Basil on June 20, 2018, 01:20:04 PM
I was wondering if there is such a thing as a 'thin' Planchet for 1946 Pennies. I found it in a bulk buy a while back,its the first Coin,the lighter coloured one. Its underweight and has a Planchet almost half the thickness of the normal 1946 on RHS. It seems well struck and genuine but may be a fake of some sort....TIA. 

(https://www.australian-coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10136/377/Sunday_17th_39obv00014.jpg)
(https://www.australian-coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10136/377/Sunday_17th_39obv00015.jpg)
(https://www.australian-coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10136/377/IMG_1095.JPG)
(https://www.australian-coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10136/377/IMG_1094.JPG)
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: Unicorn on June 20, 2018, 03:41:17 PM
Gee ...... hard call Basil ..... I'd have thought such a thin planchet would not be struck so well. The top of the 6 looks a bit iffy, triangle inside the 4, fan on the right side of the 4 ..... crikey. But I shall wait for the experts to comment, I've only ever had one in the past.
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: nealeffendi on June 20, 2018, 05:50:44 PM
Fake
Look at the second stroke of the u in aUstralia and how it lines up differently with the edge denticles
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: echidna on June 20, 2018, 07:02:58 PM
Agree - the first coin is an obvious fake.
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: Basil on June 20, 2018, 09:46:25 PM
Ok,Thanks fellas. I think the Kings Mouth & Nose on the first coin are different to a genuine 46 as well.
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: autocoupler on June 21, 2018, 12:06:43 PM
Quote from: 'Unicorn' pid='115818' dateline='1529475077'Gee ...... hard call Basil ..... I'd have thought such a thin planchet would not be struck so well. The top of the 6 looks a bit iffy, triangle inside the 4, fan on the right side of the 4 ..... crikey. But I shall wait for the experts to comment, I've only ever had one in the past.
Yes, the tail of the 6 stood out to me as well. Wouldn't be the first time a different numeral was used though
Quote from: 'nealeffendi' pid='115820' dateline='1529482844'Fake
Look at the second stroke of the u in aUstralia and how it lines up differently with the edge denticles
Hmmm, I'm having trouble seeing any difference with the alignment of the U
Quote from: 'echidna' pid='115823' dateline='1529487178'Agree - the first coin is an obvious fake.
Apart from the thin planchet and the tail on the 6, I'm not seeing too much else. Can you expand on your thoughts echi? I need instruction  :)
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: Basil on June 21, 2018, 01:36:45 PM
Quote..."Apart from the thin planchet and the tail on the 6, I'm not seeing too much else. Can you expand on your thoughts echi? I need instruction."

I've lost all confidence in dealing with these modern fakes,in hand it looks like a well struck 46 Penny except for the thin Planchet.
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: echidna on June 21, 2018, 07:34:11 PM
Quote from: 'autocoupler' pid='115827' dateline='1529548603'
Quote from: 'Unicorn' pid='115818' dateline='1529475077'Gee ...... hard call Basil ..... I'd have thought such a thin planchet would not be struck so well. The top of the 6 looks a bit iffy, triangle inside the 4, fan on the right side of the 4 ..... crikey. But I shall wait for the experts to comment, I've only ever had one in the past.
Yes, the tail of the 6 stood out to me as well. Wouldn't be the first time a different numeral was used though
Quote from: 'nealeffendi' pid='115820' dateline='1529482844'Fake
Look at the second stroke of the u in aUstralia and how it lines up differently with the edge denticles
Hmmm, I'm having trouble seeing any difference with the alignment of the U
Quote from: 'echidna' pid='115823' dateline='1529487178'Agree - the first coin is an obvious fake.
Apart from the thin planchet and the tail on the 6, I'm not seeing too much else. Can you expand on your thoughts echi? I need instruction  :)

The 6 is all wrong - too square looking.
Rims are wrong - too weak for a 46 which has strong rims.
There is a flaw on the left of the P in PENNY which is an obvious sign of a fake.

https://imgur.com/a/nomvLw1 (https://imgur.com/a/nomvLw1)
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: Basil on June 21, 2018, 09:07:57 PM
Thanks for making the effort to post Pic. Echinda,much appreciated.

(https://www.australian-coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10136/377/Fake_1946_penny.jpg)
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: Nevol on June 22, 2018, 08:33:19 AM
Thanks for sharing :thank_you:
Title: RE: 1946 'thin'' Planchet.
Post by: autocoupler on June 22, 2018, 10:31:11 AM
[quote pid='115837' dateline='1529575451']
The 6 is all wrong - too square looking.
Rims are wrong - too weak for a 46 which has strong rims.
There is a flaw on the left of the P in PENNY which is an obvious sign of a fake.

https://imgur.com/a/nomvLw1 (https://imgur.com/a/nomvLw1)
[/quote]

Thanks echi, the flaw on 9, it's so obvious after you pointed it out.  :thank_you: :)