Australian-Coins Forum

Numismatic Discussion => Coin and Banknote Grading => Topic started by: trout on January 17, 2013, 09:58:58 AM

Title: 1966 20 cents
Post by: trout on January 17, 2013, 09:58:58 AM
Its all been pre decimal so far.
How about this one.
[attachment=958][attachment=957]
Title: RE: 1966 20 cents
Post by: stevo1962 on January 17, 2013, 10:39:29 AM
A bit of scuffing on both sides MS62?
Title: RE: 1966 20 cents
Post by: trout on January 17, 2013, 10:44:08 AM
Quote from: 'stevo1962' pid='6548' dateline='1358381369'A bit of scuffing on both sides MS62?

I think i got this one in one of them BP wallets, Not that flash hay :dash1:
Title: RE: 1966 20 cents
Post by: stevo1962 on January 17, 2013, 10:50:59 AM
The fields are clean but must have been out of the wallet at some stage or can they get
that way in the wallet?
Title: RE: 1966 20 cents
Post by: enworb on January 17, 2013, 11:17:45 AM
Its still UNC at least IMO. Im betting the scuffing isnt quite as bad as the scans suggest.
Title: RE: 1966 20 cents
Post by: Graham on January 17, 2013, 11:25:07 AM
I must be too tough on my coins.  I'll have to reconsider how I grade coins.  I note the bag marks (scratches) on the 2 and the scuffing on the Queen's cheek.  I consistently threw these back when searching rolls containing much more current dates.  I would grade it at the lower end of UNC. Whats that? MS 62?

I'd have it my collection, but I would be looking to upgrade.
Title: RE: 1966 20 cents
Post by: trout on January 17, 2013, 11:37:42 AM
Quote from: 'Graham' pid='6558' dateline='1358384107'I must be too tough on my coins.  I'll have to reconsider how I grade coins.  I note the bag marks (scratches) on the 2 and the scuffing on the Queen's cheek.  I consistently threw these back when searching rolls containing much more current dates.  I would grade it at the lower end of UNC. Whats that? MS 62?

I'd have it my collection, but I would be looking to upgrade.

I agree, I'm working on that :good: