Found this in the till at work today.
Barely a mark on it. Would have to grade UNC at minimum.
(http://www.australian-coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10113/2002_Reverse.JPG)
(http://www.australian-coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10113/2002_Obverse.JPG)
Now I've posted a big pic I can see a few more marks on it, but still not bad for a circulation find.
"not bad" is an understatement. More like "bloody good"!
Nice find and nice clear pickies. Well done.
Very, very nice!
Pedro
Quote from: 'Triggersmob' pid='71368' dateline='1430035640'Would have to grade UNC at minimum.
Now you're making me wonder where I stashed my sack of UNCs.
I had been waiting to find out mintage before noodling them for the errors, and it just kinda slipped my mind.
Reckon I've waited long enough? ;)
Thanks for the nice comment.
Fulvio, get into them mate. :)
Quote from: 'Triggersmob' pid='71411' dateline='1430094330'Fulvio, get into them mate. :)
Found 'em!:
(http://i.imgur.com/ZDSBHCH.jpg)
BUT (isn't there always a but?)
Check my next post
OOOO Shiny :angel:
Looks like the mice have had a shot at the bag tho Mate :dodgy:
Quote from: 'trout' pid='71434' dateline='1430118907'OOOO Shiny :angel:
Looks like the mice have had a shot at the bag tho Mate :dodgy:
Not so shiny. Check the other thread. :(
And no, those are airholes punched into the sack. Notice the chad still attached? They're a lot bigger nowadays.
Why are you using Spud bags Mate :angel:
Quote from: 'trout' pid='71442' dateline='1430120623'Why are you using Spud bags Mate :angel:
Hehe.. ask Armaguard.
Mind you, it doesn't seem to matter what you use.. none of it protects your coins. :(