Trying to work out if this coin is uncirculated but its very difficult from
these photos .What do you think
(http://www.australian-coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10137/32a.JPG)
(http://www.australian-coins.net/gallery/albums/userpics/10137/32b.JPG)
just my opinion
unc - maybe a tad bagmarked on the reverse / a bit of rub on the high points but minimal
i'd think that the pcgs boys (as they don't have girls) would wack a 63 or 64 (i'd be thinking 64 BN if it were my consignment)
Quote from: 'robbiegal' pid='64966' dateline='1420594208'just my opinion
unc - maybe a tad bagmarked on the reverse / a bit of rub on the high points but minimal
i'd think that the pcgs boys (as they don't have girls) would wack a 63 or 64 (i'd be thinking 64 BN if it were my consignment)
Thanks Robbie just trying to work out if it's worth the investment
cheers
I don't have as much experience as others here and just did my own special grading standard: 'robbiseyesdidtheaussiegrading'
if they count every ding then maybe it would go down to a 62
I count up to 5 dings/scratches/bag marks regularly on most 64 pcgs grades and then they have the special surface assessment of which I know little
I usually think about the lowest grade it is likely to record at PCGS and use that as a guide. Blue Sheet has a value of $420 for 1932 penny in MS62BN (which sounds a little optimistic to me).
Quote from: 'Nightparrot' pid='64970' dateline='1420595300'I usually think about the lowest grade it is likely to record at PCGS and use that as a guide. Blue Sheet has a value of $420 for 1932 penny in MS62BN (which sounds a little optimistic to me).
Yeah that's about what it would owe me slabbed so maybe not
worth the risk at that price
I'd second RobbieGal 63/64BN looks accurate the 7th/8th diamonds look a little fuzzy but the orb on top looks great so I would put it down to a slightly weak strike.
Quote from: 'oh my florin' pid='64975' dateline='1420600403'I'd second RobbieGal 63/64BN looks accurate the 7th/8th diamonds look a little fuzzy but the orb on top looks great so I would put it down to a slightly weak strike.
Makes it a bit more tempting thanks OMF
Do my eyes deceive me or does the reverse show signs of die clashing?
It looks MS62, perhaps MS63. I think the lack of lustre or brilliance would preclude a higher grade. Still a nice coin and one I'd be happy with.
Quote from: 'nealeffendi' pid='64978' dateline='1420608192'Do my eyes deceive me or does the reverse show signs of die clashing?
Maybe a hint of doubling on the base of the word penny but hard to
see anything else in the photo
I agree Neal, to the right and down of the ONE to me is nose and moustache and through and to the left of the second N is the under chin. (Could be just me though). :angel:
Oh, and that may make the inner ear under the N in ONE.
PS: Nice coin Stevo!!!
Quote from: 'Unicorn' pid='64981' dateline='1420611973'I agree Neal, to the right and down of the ONE to me is nose and moustache and through and to the left of the second N is the under chin. (Could be just me though). :angel:
Oh, and that may make the inner ear under the N in ONE.
PS: Nice coin Stevo!!!
Nothin' wrong with your eyes
Ghost overlay
(http://i679.photobucket.com/albums/vv160/ford_prefect/ACF%20Odd%20Stuff/1932PennyRX-Ghost_zps66638025.jpg)
Quote from: 'Fordprefect' pid='64984' dateline='1420617540'Quote from: 'Unicorn' pid='64981' dateline='1420611973'I agree Neal, to the right and down of the ONE to me is nose and moustache and through and to the left of the second N is the under chin. (Could be just me though). :angel:
Oh, and that may make the inner ear under the N in ONE.
PS: Nice coin Stevo!!!
Nothin' wrong with your eyes
Ghost overlay
That's clever!
Beautifully done FP!
It reminds me of Mark's lovely work on my 10c.