If not,why not
(http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo339/appeangel07_photos/29-9-08/new%20coin%20album/353142c6-47fb-4fb9-8e6a-fea8e8c89954_zps5affa859.jpg)
(http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo339/appeangel07_photos/29-9-08/new%20coin%20album/b2102221-3c72-436d-8040-3d4b265807e2_zps001ecb1c.jpg)
It is not possible to tell from an image. You can only do so with the coin in hand.
I agree with emu that it would be better to see it in person but I'll determine from those photos that it is RB for RD at least 95% of the coin must be brilliant, RB 94%-6% brilliant, BN is less than 5%.
As emu said it's impossible to be sure from a photo due to unknown lighting conditions. That being said, I'd be leaning to not.
The light parts in the reverse legend indicate the remainder of the reverse surfaces have light toning which would preclude an RD designation.
nice coin accums, regardless
i'd reckon it's an aussie red but a pcgs RB
Just sticking my neck out here, But from those images I get a MS64 brown from them :ok:
I agree with wwwww and trout it is much better to see in person.
Thanks for the replies, one day we may know for sure.
I liberated this one from Eric's website.
This is how I like my red browns to be:
(http://www.thesandpit.net/pennies/1934_o.JPG)
(http://www.thesandpit.net/pennies/1934_r.JPG)