Australian-Coins Forum

Australian Coins, Banknotes and Exonumia => Australian Errors and Varieties => Topic started by: purplepennyhunter on October 23, 2012, 09:29:32 PM

Title: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: purplepennyhunter on October 23, 2012, 09:29:32 PM
I want to see your crack, 1966 silvers please on the reverse. Anyone got any?
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: enworb on October 23, 2012, 11:45:31 PM
I have not seen cracks, plenty of laminations/planchet flaws though.
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Australian coin on October 24, 2012, 12:20:21 PM
Haven’t heard of them before?
Did see a pic of a slight lamination
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: purplepennyhunter on October 24, 2012, 04:09:17 PM
I haven't had the chance yet to look at my 1966 50c. A RAM statement from 1968 says they had problems with striking pressure needed to strike up the roo and emu on the reverse and the legends on the obverse. This resulted in  reverse die cracking and a shorter life of the dies.  They went so far as to have the Defense Standards Lab test the pressures needed and order modified dies from the Royal Mint in London. This statement was before they'd decided to change the shape,composition so I expect that none of these new dies were ever used.
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Australian coin on October 24, 2012, 07:24:17 PM
Just putting it out there, could it be something as simple as the double bar?
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Mister T on October 24, 2012, 08:44:01 PM
This (http://www.sterlingcurrency.com.au/research/pattern-australian-silver-50-machin) may be relevant.

When in 1968 was the statement made?
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: purplepennyhunter on October 25, 2012, 06:33:58 AM
Quote from: 'Mister T' pid='1826' dateline='1351073641'This (http://www.sterlingcurrency.com.au/research/pattern-australian-silver-50-machin) may be relevant.

When in 1968 was the statement made?

I hadn't thought it be as simple as that but you may have hit it on the head. The statement was by the RAM controller in Jan 1968 published in the Third Annual RAM Annual Report 1966-67.

Maybe Andrew (the author of the Sterling and Currency article) might come along and comment.
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Mister T on October 25, 2012, 08:54:19 AM
I checked my 1966 50c pieces and I couldn't see any reverse die cracks.

Also, could it be that the new dies had a new composition rather than a modified design?
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: purplepennyhunter on October 25, 2012, 08:40:30 PM
Well they didn't produce any more round 50c and changed to the dodecagonal shape after that.
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: errorsarebest on October 25, 2012, 08:51:34 PM
As I recall, they went away from the round 50 cent coins because at the time some senior citizens were mistaking them for 20 cent coins.
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: purplepennyhunter on October 26, 2012, 07:07:36 AM
It mentions that too and justifies it by saying that English florins and half-crowns circulated together since 1849 without confusion and New Zealand 50c and 20c appear readily acceptible, were we just whingers?
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Mister T on October 26, 2012, 02:18:43 PM
Maybe, but the New Zealand 50c had interrupted milling, so it wasn't all bad.
I'm not sure how they managed before though. I mixed some New Zealand florins hand half-crowns together and they all looked the same to me.

Also, when was the change to a dodecagonal 50c piece decided?
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: purplepennyhunter on October 26, 2012, 02:38:36 PM
50c Timeline (http://www.australian-threepence.com/blog/2011/12/timeline-of-the-1966-round-australian-50c.html)
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Mister T on October 26, 2012, 02:48:40 PM
Ah thanks. Is there a month when the last circulation 1966 50c pieces were struck? Seems like it was before the end of 1966 going by the timeline.
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Fordprefect on October 26, 2012, 03:10:25 PM
A good article. From the Political side's perspective.

A number of dodecagonal designs had been submitted
for the '66 & '67 coins.

The rising Silver price was the prime motivation to go Cupro
the dodecagonal shape pacified the old farts. :yahoo:

(http://i679.photobucket.com/albums/vv160/ford_prefect/OzRoundtable/50cPatterns66-67.jpg)
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Mister T on October 26, 2012, 03:17:56 PM
I wonder whether those patterns were silver or not.
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Fordprefect on October 26, 2012, 03:47:28 PM
Treasury had requested that submissions be in no less than .800 fine,
so I presume they were. Dion Skinner who assembled the collage does
not mention metal type.

There is also a Image attribution stuff-up in the collage.
Image 1 is in fact item 4
Image 4 is item 1
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Australian coin on October 26, 2012, 05:42:22 PM
Cool, do those coins actually exist somewhere!
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Mister T on October 26, 2012, 05:51:24 PM
Maybe deep in the mint somewhere.
I thought those examples were shown to Dion Skinner by David Gee back in the day, but I'm not completely sure.
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Australian coin on October 26, 2012, 06:00:40 PM
I remember seeing these pics of 1966 50c,
>>
http://www.cruzis-coins.com/50c/1966db.html

But wow, would love to see photos of the beaded 50c’s

(http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTfXPqH3IP2mHgpeo4VUW5-rX-d2wg4bopIcuPnpLQzcFGrCtcZ9g:www.boomspeed.com/mugarinya1/19662der.gif)

(http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRXFoMXH0CsGtDH-x4WuE08x6DfCtbZMTViP0BKtO_f6qTA2OKq:www.boomspeed.com/mugarinya1/1966deto.gif)

I also found the “clear field pic”

Wonder if this is the same person’s pic?
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Fordprefect on October 27, 2012, 12:13:53 AM
Quote from: 'Mister T' pid='1889' dateline='1351236084'Maybe deep in the mint somewhere.
I thought those examples were shown to Dion Skinner by David Gee back in the day, but I'm not completely sure.

Yes, in the novel "Heads I Win" the story of Australia's most famous forger, it is stated that Gee requested a meeting with Skinner and it took place, 1972 in Sydney.
In 1974, when Gee was interviewed by police, Gee had in his posession 10 50c pattern Australian coins thought to be the property of the R.A.M..
At his court appearance in '76 the charge sheet read 8 examples.
Two examples, struck in Aluminium had been claimed to have been gifted to him (Gee) by Henderson the retired chief of RAM.
Henderson neither confirmed or denied the claim.

Of the 17 known surviving pattern coins prepared by Vembola Veinberg (Chief Engraver, RAM) only the eight retrieved from Gee are held by the RAM. The whereabouts of the balance of nine is still a mystery including the Aluminium examples.
All other patterns were smelted in the RAM's furnace.

Sorry to drag it off-topic, but interesting story:drooling:
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: purplepennyhunter on October 27, 2012, 07:31:02 AM
If that's off-topic I'll just change the topic name. I read the David Gee story a few years ago now and loved it. Maybe if more books were about coins then I'd read some more.

btw I don't think we have off-topic police  here.
Title: RE: 1966 50c Reverse Die Cracks
Post by: Mister T on October 27, 2012, 09:12:40 AM
Quote from: 'Fordprefect' pid='1903' dateline='1351259033'All other patterns were smelted in the RAM's furnace.

What a waste.